Jelte M Wicherts
PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0147913

Medicine | Science

Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review, and develop and validate a tool enabling different stakeholders to assess transparency of the peer-review process.Based on editorial guidelines and best practices, I developed a 14-item tool to rate transparency of the peer-review process on the basis of journals' websites. In Study 1, a random sample of 231 authors of papers in 92 subscription journals in different fields rated transparency of the journals that published their work. Authors' ratings of the transparency were positively associated with quality of the peer-review process but unrelated to journal's impact factors. In Study 2, 20 experts on OA publishing assessed the transparency of established (non-OA) journals, OA journals categorized as being published by potential predatory publishers, and journals from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Results show high reliability across items (α = .91) and sufficient reliability across raters. Ratings differentiated the three types of journals well. In Study 3, academic librarians rated a random sample of 140 DOAJ journals and another 54 journals that had received a hoax paper written by Bohannon to test peer-review quality. Journals with higher transparency ratings were less likely to accept the flawed paper and showed higher impact as measured by the h5 index from Google Scholar.The tool to assess transparency of the peer-review process at academic journals shows promising reliability and validity. The transparency of the peer-review process can be seen as an indicator of peer-review quality allowing the tool to be used to predict academic quality in new journals.

3rd degree connections


Factors affecting working conditions in public hospitals: A literature review
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2017.02.002)
Working conditions in public hospitals have been of great concern to health care personnel worldwide. However, from an international perspective, there is no evidence of literature review that has been conducted on this important topic. The objective...

4th degree connections


Knowledge Management and Czech Self-Governments: Empirical Investigations into the Application of Knowledge Management to Public Administration in the Czech Republic
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0009)
Although knowledge management has become the subject of an enormous quantity of articles and books in recent times, certain more problematic aspects of it remain neglected. Firstly, literature addressing knowledge management concentrates almost exclu...

3rd degree connections


Research collaboration and topic trends in Computer Science based on top active authors
PeerJ Computer Science 2016 (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.41)
Academic publication metadata can be used to analyze the collaboration, productivity and hot topic trends of a research community. In this paper, we study a specific group of authors, namely the top active authors. They are defined as the top 1% auth...

1st degree connections


Estimated effects of implementing an open access policy for grantees at a private foundation
PeerJ 2017 (https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3853)
Background The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) was interested in understanding the potential effects of requiring that grantees publish their peer-reviewed research in open access journals. Methods We collected data on more than 2,000 public...

Health Disparities in Women
Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1177/1179562X17709546)
Aims and scope: Clinical Medicine Insights: Women’s Health is an international, open-access, peer-reviewed journal which considers manuscripts on all aspects of the diagnosis, management, and prevention of disorders specific to women, in addition to ...

4th degree connections


Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News.
PLoS ONE 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168217)
Exaggerated or simplistic news is often blamed for adversely influencing public health. However, recent findings suggested many exaggerations were already present in university press releases, which scientists approve. Surprisingly, these exaggeratio...

3rd degree connections


Onward to 2016
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers 2016 (https://doi.org/10.5772/62278)
As we embrace for another exciting year (2016), we are thrilled to announce JCB has been indexed in the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) (https://doaj.org/toc/ 1849-4544)! This was attributable to the number of quality published original rese...

1st degree connections


Academic Social Networks and Open Access: French Researchers at the Crossroads
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries 2016 (https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10131)
Researchers benefit from an increasing array of tools to enhance direct communication and the dissemination of their research findings. These include Open Access repositories, Open Access journals, or hybrid publishing. For some years, researchers ha...

3rd degree connections


PaLRaP Earns the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Seal of Approval
Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice 2016 (https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2016.126)
In early 2016 PaLRaP was added to the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and received the DOAJ Seal of Approval....

Copy below code to your website in order to embed a kmapper preview widget of this article.
<script id="kmapper_widget" src="https://kmapper.herokuapp.com/embed.js" doi="10-1371-journal-pone-0147913" width="240" height="240"></script><div id="kmapper_badge"></div>